From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schwarz v. E. Regensburg Sons

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 26, 1918
119 N.E. 1076 (N.Y. 1918)

Opinion

Argued February 4, 1918

Decided February 26, 1918

Edmund L. Mooney, Martin Paskus and Frederick A. Card for appellant.

Joseph M. Proskauer, Maurice S. Hyman and Samuel Kramer for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, CARDOZO, POUND, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ.


Summaries of

Schwarz v. E. Regensburg Sons

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 26, 1918
119 N.E. 1076 (N.Y. 1918)
Case details for

Schwarz v. E. Regensburg Sons

Case Details

Full title:MOE SCHWARZ, as Executor of ISIDOR FREY, Deceased, Respondent, v . E…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 26, 1918

Citations

119 N.E. 1076 (N.Y. 1918)
119 N.E. 1076

Citing Cases

Greaves v. Am. Inst. for Scientific Research

Authorities exist on both sides of the question. In Schwarz v. Regensburg Son, 168 A.D. 903; affd., 223 N.Y.…

Cary v. U.S. Hoffman Machinery Corporation

On the first point, see Heaman v. E.N. Rowell Co., 236 App. Div. 34, 258 N.Y.S. 138, which cites with…