From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schuster v. Schweitzer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 25, 1994
203 A.D.2d 552 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

April 25, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCaffrey, J.).


Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellants expressly state in their brief that "[n]o appeal has been taken from that part of the decision * * * which denied the motions for summary judgment".

Inasmuch as the appellants do not challenge the denial of their cross motion for summary judgment, but limit their appeal to dicta in the decision portion of the decision and order (one paper), their appeal must be dismissed, since no appeal lies from a decision (see, Schicchi v Green Constr. Corp., 100 A.D.2d 509). Thompson, J.P., Rosenblatt, Ritter, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Schuster v. Schweitzer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 25, 1994
203 A.D.2d 552 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Schuster v. Schweitzer

Case Details

Full title:DAVID SCHUSTER et al., Respondents, v. RONALD SCHWEITZER et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 25, 1994

Citations

203 A.D.2d 552 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
612 N.Y.S.2d 933

Citing Cases

Waldorf v. Maher

The Estate appeals from dicta, and thus its appeal must be dismissed as no appeal lies from dicta (seeYang…

Matter of Khatib v. Liverpool Cen. S. Dist

Memorandum: Petitioners, as limited by their brief, do not challenge any part of the judgment on appeal, but…