From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SCHUPPER v. EDIE

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Mar 20, 2007
Civil Case No. 06-cv-01524-LTB-MJW (D. Colo. Mar. 20, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Case No. 06-cv-01524-LTB-MJW.

March 20, 2007


ORDER


This case is before me on the Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge that the Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative Motion for More Definite Statement (Docket #10) and Defendfant Zook's Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative Motion for More Definite Statement (Docket #45) be granted and that the complaint be dismissed with prejudice. The Plaintiff has filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. I have therefore reviewed the recommendation de novo in light of the file and record in this case. On de novo review, I conclude that the recommendations are correct. Accordingly

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative Motion for More Definite Statement (Docket #10) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Zook's Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative Motion for More Definite Statement (Docket #45) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.


Summaries of

SCHUPPER v. EDIE

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Mar 20, 2007
Civil Case No. 06-cv-01524-LTB-MJW (D. Colo. Mar. 20, 2007)
Case details for

SCHUPPER v. EDIE

Case Details

Full title:SANFORD B. SCHUPPER, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM EDIE, ROBYN CAFASSO, JEANNE…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Mar 20, 2007

Citations

Civil Case No. 06-cv-01524-LTB-MJW (D. Colo. Mar. 20, 2007)

Citing Cases

Skyline Potato Co. v. Tan-O-On Mktg., Inc.

In determining whether a movant has shown excusable neglect, a court should consider the circumstances,…

Scull v. Mgmt. & Training Corp.

To determine whether a party has shown excusable neglect, the Court should consider: (i) the danger of…