From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schuman v. Dausch

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Nov 26, 1940
307 Ill. App. 379 (Ill. App. Ct. 1940)

Opinion

Gen. No. 41,215. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed November 26, 1940

ABATEMENT AND REVIVAL, § 14foreclosure of senior mortgage, as not bar to foreclosure of junior mortgage. Where foreclosure proeeedings on first mortgage were pending when junior mortgagee sued to foreclose, the two suits were different and separate actions, and mortgagor could not obtain dismissal of second suit on plea of a prior suit pending, and while junior mortgagee could have filed a cross bill in first proceeding, he was not required to do so.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from Superior Court of Cook county; Hon. CHARLES A. WILLIAMS, presiding.

Affirmed. Heard in second division, first district, this court at April term, 1940.

Irving G. Zazove, for appellant;

Nathan Schwartz, for appellee.


"Not to be published in full." Opinion filed November 26, 1940.


Summaries of

Schuman v. Dausch

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Nov 26, 1940
307 Ill. App. 379 (Ill. App. Ct. 1940)
Case details for

Schuman v. Dausch

Case Details

Full title:Jack Schuman, Appellee, v. Mary Dausch et al., Defendants. Appeal of…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: Nov 26, 1940

Citations

307 Ill. App. 379 (Ill. App. Ct. 1940)
30 N.E.2d 195

Citing Cases

People ex Rel. Phillips Petrol. v. Gitchoff

Consequently, section 48(1)(c) did not preclude Phillips from filing a separate indemnity suit, even though…