From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schulz v. State Legislature

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 22, 1998
703 N.E.2d 267 (N.Y. 1998)

Opinion

Submitted August 31, 1998

Decided September 22, 1998


Reported below, ___ A.D.2d ___.

Motion to disqualify Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Levine and Ciparick dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals has no authority to entertain the motion made on nonstatutory grounds. The application seeking recusal is referred to the Judges for individual consideration and determination by each Judge (see, Matter of Sims, 62 N.Y.2d 884; New York Criminal Civ. Cts. Bar Assn. v. State of New York 46 N.Y.2d 730; Matter of Waltemade, 37 N.Y.2d [a], [ll]).

Concur: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges BELLACOSA, SMITH, LEVINE, CIPARICK and WESLEY.

Chief Judge KAYE and Judges BELLACOSA, LEVINE and CIPARICK each respectively denies the referred motion for disqualification.

On the Court's own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.


Summaries of

Schulz v. State Legislature

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 22, 1998
703 N.E.2d 267 (N.Y. 1998)
Case details for

Schulz v. State Legislature

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT L. SCHULZ et al., Appellants, v. NEW YORK STATE LEGISLATURE et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Sep 22, 1998

Citations

703 N.E.2d 267 (N.Y. 1998)
703 N.E.2d 267

Citing Cases

In re State Bar Assoc. of Crim. Def. Lawyers v. Kaye

It is not an uncommon practice for the Chief Judge alone to be recused in similar appeals involving judicial…