Schults v. Bd. of Ed. of Teaneck

Full title: FRANK SCHULTS, JR., A MINOR BY FRANK SCHULTS, HIS FATHER AND NEXT FRIEND…

Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jun 1, 1965

210 A.2d 762 (N.J. 1965)

210 A.2d 762

Opinion

Argued May 17, 1965 —

Decided June 1, 1965.

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Milton T. Lasher argued the cause for appellants.

Mr. Irving C. Evers argued the cause for respondents ( Messrs. Parisi, Evers Greenfield, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the Appellate Division's determination ( 86 N.J. Super. 29 (1964)) that the plaintiffs should first have exhausted their administrative remedies before the Commissioner and State Board of Education. The dismissal of their complaint is:

Affirmed.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 6.

For reversal — None.