Summary
finding that plaintiff had rebutted the presumption of continuing nondisability by submitting additional medical records establishing the existence of a new severe impairment
Summary of this case from Asmar v. ColvinOpinion
3:08-cv-00223-LRH (VPC).
December 9, 2009
ORDER
The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke (#13) entered on August 10, 2009, in which the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Plaintiff's Motion for Reversal (#11) be denied and Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (#12) be granted. No objections have been filed. The Court has considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record and has made a review and determination in accordance with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and applicable case law, and good cause appearing, the court hereby
ADOPTS AND ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (#13); therefore, Plaintiff's Motion for Reversal (#11) is DENIED and Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (#12) is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.