From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schreiber v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Feb 12, 1947
160 F.2d 108 (6th Cir. 1947)

Opinion

No. 10361.

February 12, 1947.

Appeal from decision of the Tax Court of the United States.

John F. Langs, of Detroit, Mich., for petitioner.

Douglas W. McGregor, J.P. Wenchel, Sewall Key, Robert N. Anderson and Harry Baum, all of Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before HICKS, ALLEN and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.


This cause was heard and submitted upon transcript of record, oral arguments and printed briefs of attorneys for the contending parties;

And it appearing that the findings of fact of the Tax Court of the United States are supported by substantial evidence and are not clearly erroneous, and that the conclusions of law reached in the opinion of that tribunal conform to the principles announced in Commissioner v. Tower, 327 U.S. 280, 66 S.Ct. 532, and Lusthaus v. Commissioner, 327 U.S. 293, 66 S.Ct. 539, and are rationalized upon sound reasoning [See Dobson v. Commissioner, 320 U.S. 489, 64 S.Ct. 239, 88 L.Ed. 248];

The decision of the Tax Court, 6 T.C. 707, in the case of Abe Schreiber v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue is affirmed; likewise, the decision of the Tax Court in the case of J.C. Shaprow v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue is affirmed.


Summaries of

Schreiber v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Feb 12, 1947
160 F.2d 108 (6th Cir. 1947)
Case details for

Schreiber v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Abe SCHREIBER, et al., Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE…

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Feb 12, 1947

Citations

160 F.2d 108 (6th Cir. 1947)

Citing Cases

Hougland v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

er, 327 U.S. 293, 66 S.Ct. 539, 90 L.Ed. 679, decided on the same day, this court has, upon many occasions in…

Easley Trust v. Commr. of Internal Revenue

Even though there was an overassessment for the years in question and this resulted in a refund of the amount…