From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SCHRAMM v. ARSENAL ESSO

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Nov 20, 1973
311 A.2d 178 (N.J. 1973)

Opinion

Argued November 5, 1973 —

Decided November 20, 1973.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Herbert Klein argued the cause for appellant Krauszer's Vending, Inc. ( Messrs. Krieger and Klein, attorneys; Mr. William J. Pollinger on the brief).

Mr. Philip M. Lustbader argued the cause for respondent Arsenal Esso Station. ( Philip M. Lustbader, David Lustbader, a Professional Corporation, attorneys).


The judgment is affirmed substantally for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. Schramm v. Arsenal Esso Station and Krauszer's Vending, Inc., reported at 124 N.J. Super. 135 (App.Div. 1973).

For affirmance — Justices JACOBS, HALL, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN and CLIFFORD and Judge CONFORD — 6.

Opposed — None.


Summaries of

SCHRAMM v. ARSENAL ESSO

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Nov 20, 1973
311 A.2d 178 (N.J. 1973)
Case details for

SCHRAMM v. ARSENAL ESSO

Case Details

Full title:BERTHA SCHRAMM AND GEORGE SCHRAMM, PLAINTIFFS'-RESPONDENTS, v. ARSENAL…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Nov 20, 1973

Citations

311 A.2d 178 (N.J. 1973)
311 A.2d 178

Citing Cases

Warwick Dev., LLC v. McGruder

Even in the absence of fraud, an employer who "has been compelled to pay damages to a third person for the…

Stephenson v. R.A. Jones Co., Inc.

Thus the New Jersey rule is that to recover in implied indemnity on the theory that the other party was the…