From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schoonmaker v. Heckscher

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 16, 1916
113 N.E. 1066 (N.Y. 1916)

Opinion

Argued May 30, 1916

Decided June 16, 1916

Edmund L. Baylies, Walter F. Taylor and Edwin D. Bechtel for appellants.

Jabish Holmes, Francis J. McBarron and P.S. Dean for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CHASE, COLLIN, HOGAN, CARDOZO and SEABURY, JJ. Dissenting: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., and HISCOCK, J.


Summaries of

Schoonmaker v. Heckscher

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 16, 1916
113 N.E. 1066 (N.Y. 1916)
Case details for

Schoonmaker v. Heckscher

Case Details

Full title:SYLVANUS L. SCHOONMAKER et al., Appellants, v . AUGUST HECKSCHER…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 16, 1916

Citations

113 N.E. 1066 (N.Y. 1916)
113 N.E. 1066

Citing Cases

Weinberg v. Edelstein

The omission of "ladies sports clothes", it seems to me, is significant in the light of the use clause in the…

Weinberg v. Edelstein

The omission of "ladies sports clothes", it seems to me, is significant in the light of the use clause in the…