From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

School District of Ackley v. Hall

U.S.
Jan 1, 1882
106 U.S. 428 (1882)

Opinion

OCTOBER TERM, 1882.

A writ of error will not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction by reason of a failure to annex thereto or return therewith an assignment of errors, pursuant to the requirements of sect. 997 Rev. Stat.

Mr. Walter H. Smith and Mr. Alexander T. Britton in support of the motions.

Mr. Galusha Parsons, contra.


MOTION to dismiss a writ of error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Iowa, with which is united a motion to affirm.


A failure to annex to or return with a writ of error an assignment of errors, as required by sect. 997 of the Revised Statutes, is no ground for dismissal for want of jurisdiction. If an assignment is filed in accordance with the requirements of par. 4, Rule 21, it will ordinarily be enough.

There is not in this case such a color of right to a dismissal as to make it proper for us to consider the motion to affirm. Whitney v. Cook, 99 U.S. 607.

Motions denied.


Summaries of

School District of Ackley v. Hall

U.S.
Jan 1, 1882
106 U.S. 428 (1882)
Case details for

School District of Ackley v. Hall

Case Details

Full title:SCHOOL DISTRICT OF ACKLEY v . HALL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 1, 1882

Citations

106 U.S. 428 (1882)
1 S. Ct. 417

Citing Cases

The Alaska

Oliver v. Alexander, 6 Pet. 143; The Mamie, 105 U.S. 773; Ex parte Baltimore and Ohio Railroad, 106 U.S. 5;…

Gumbel v. Pitkin

A writ of error will not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction by reason of failure to return with it an…