From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scholz v. New York and Harlem Railroad Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 2, 1903
175 N.Y. 485 (N.Y. 1903)

Opinion

Argued May 21, 1903

Decided June 2, 1903

Ira A. Place and Thomas Emery for appellants.

James C. Bushby and Henry G. Atwater for respondent.


Judgment reversed and complaint dismissed, without costs, on authority of Kriete v. N.Y. H.R.R. Co. ( 175 N.Y. 484).

Concur: PARKER, Ch. J., O'BRIEN, HAIGHT, MARTIN, CULLEN and WERNER, JJ. Not sitting: GRAY, J.


Summaries of

Scholz v. New York and Harlem Railroad Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 2, 1903
175 N.Y. 485 (N.Y. 1903)
Case details for

Scholz v. New York and Harlem Railroad Company

Case Details

Full title:FRANZISKA SCHOLZ, Respondent, v . THE NEW YORK AND HARLEM RAILROAD COMPANY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 2, 1903

Citations

175 N.Y. 485 (N.Y. 1903)
67 N.E. 1089

Citing Cases

Scholz v. New York and Harlem Railroad Company

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 175 N.Y. 485.)…

Muhlker v. Harlem Railroad Co.

Dolan v. Railroad Co., 74 A.D. 434; S.C., 175 N.Y. 367; Ehret v. Railroad Co., 74 A.D. 628; S.C., 175 N.Y.…