From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schneider v. Unum Life Insurance Company Of, America

United States District Court, D. Oregon
May 6, 2008
CV. 05-1402 PK (D. Or. May. 6, 2008)

Summary

ordering plaintiff to take similar actions

Summary of this case from Stensland v. City of Wilsonville

Opinion

CV. 05-1402 PK.

May 6, 2008


OPINION AND ORDER


Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and Recommendation (#97) on April 14, 2008, recommending that defendant's Motion to Dismiss (#88) be denied. The matter is now before this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).

When, as here, no objections are filed, the court is not required to review the factual or legal conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. See, Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).

After review, I agree with Judge Papak's Recommendation. There is no legal error. The court adopts Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and Recommendations (#97). Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (#88) is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Schneider v. Unum Life Insurance Company Of, America

United States District Court, D. Oregon
May 6, 2008
CV. 05-1402 PK (D. Or. May. 6, 2008)

ordering plaintiff to take similar actions

Summary of this case from Stensland v. City of Wilsonville

In Schneider, the debtor failed to disclose a potential cause of action against the defendant as an asset in bankruptcy and then subsequently brought a separate cause of action against that defendant.

Summary of this case from Kurchack v. Life Insurance Company of North America
Case details for

Schneider v. Unum Life Insurance Company Of, America

Case Details

Full title:CAROL SCHNEIDER, Plaintiff, v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF, AMERICA…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: May 6, 2008

Citations

CV. 05-1402 PK (D. Or. May. 6, 2008)

Citing Cases

Stensland v. City of Wilsonville

In order to ensure the integrity of the bankruptcy system and the judicial system as a whole, and to ensure…

Rieken v. Timberland Bank

Id. However, “[a] plaintiffs lack of prudential standing does not rob the court of subject matter…