From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schneider v. Analisa Salon LTD

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 9, 2000
270 A.D.2d 245 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued February 1, 2000

March 9, 2000

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.), entered December 4, 1998, as, upon reargument, adhered to a prior determination in an order of the same court entered October 13, 1998, granting the motion of the defendants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Anthony J. Caputo, P.C., White Plains, N.Y. (Michael Fuller Sirignano of counsel), for appellants.

Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman Dicker, New York, N Y (Eugene T. Boule and Meredith Drucker of counsel), for respondents.

DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., FRED T. SANTUCCI, WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, LEO F. McGINITY, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff Lois Schneider was allegedly injured when she slipped and fell on a floor mat at a fitness spa owned and operated by the defendants. She and her husband thereafter commenced this action, inter alia, to recover damages for negligence. After issue was joined, the defendants moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. In the order appealed from, the Supreme Court, upon granting reargument, adhered to a prior determination in an order of the same court entered October 13, 1998, granting the motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

In opposition to the defendants' prima facie demonstration of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact that the defendants either created the dangerous condition alleged, or had actual or constructive notice thereof and failed to remedy it within a reasonable time (see, Markowitz v. Supermarkets Gen. Corp., 237 A.D.2d 493 ; Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836 ). Thus, the Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to the defendants.

RITTER, J.P., SANTUCCI, THOMPSON, and McGINITY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Schneider v. Analisa Salon LTD

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 9, 2000
270 A.D.2d 245 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Schneider v. Analisa Salon LTD

Case Details

Full title:LOIS SCHNEIDER, et al., appellants, v. ANALISA SALON LTD., etc., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 9, 2000

Citations

270 A.D.2d 245 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
704 N.Y.S.2d 843

Citing Cases

Schneider v. Analisa Salon LTD

DECISION ORDER ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, with costs, as the order was superseded by an order of…

MORMILE v. JAMESTOWN MGT. CORP.

Defendants were not required to cover the floors with mats ( see Kovelsky v City University of New York, 221…