From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schmigel v. Cumbie Concrete Company

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 14, 2005
915 So. 2d 776 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 1D05-1034.

December 14, 2005.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Paul M. Hawkes, Acting Judge.

Marie A. Mattox and James Garrity of Marie A. Mattox, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Marsha E. Rule, Martin P. McDonnell, and Harold F.X. Purnell of Rutledge, Ecenia, Purnell Hoffman, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellee.


We affirm the trial court's award of attorney's fees pursuant to sections 57.105(1)(a) and 448.104, Florida Statutes (2004). Section 57.105(4) does not provide a 21-day safe harbor when the trial court awards fees on its own initiative, as authorized by subsection (1), because subsection (4) applies only to "[a] motion by a party." Appellants cannot claim lack of notice under the facts at bar, because the trial court grounded its award upon the issue appellee raised in its motion for attorney's fees; nor can appellants claim lack of opportunity to be heard, because the trial court set forth a briefing schedule that appellants failed to utilize.

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, DAVIS and BENTON, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Schmigel v. Cumbie Concrete Company

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 14, 2005
915 So. 2d 776 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Schmigel v. Cumbie Concrete Company

Case Details

Full title:Ruby L. SCHMIGEL, Appellant, v. CUMBIE CONCRETE COMPANY, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Dec 14, 2005

Citations

915 So. 2d 776 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

Walker v. Cash Register Auto Ins

This subsection has been construed as not applying where a court orders 57.105 sanctions on its own motion.…