From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schmidt v. Shoftstall Alfalfa

Supreme Court of Nebraska
Oct 11, 1991
239 Neb. 248 (Neb. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-900.

Filed October 11, 1991.

1. Workers' Compensation: Appeal and Error. A direct appeal to the Supreme Court from the order of a single judge of the Workers' Compensation Court is not authorized. 2. Workers' Compensation: Judgments: Time. An application for rehearing following the hearing before a single judge of the Workers' Compensation Court must be filed within 14 days after the date of the order of the single judge. 3. ___: ___: ___. A failure to file an application for a rehearing within 14 days after the date of the order of a single judge results in the order of the single judge becoming final and conclusive upon all parties in interest.

Appeal from the Nebraska Workers' Compensation Court. Affirmed.

Richard L. Alexander, of Alexander Alexander Alexander, for appellant.

Richard R. Endacott, of Knudsen, Berkheimer, Richardson Endacott, for appellees.

HASTINGS, C.J., WHITE, CAPORALE, SHANAHAN, GRANT, and FAHRNBRUCH, JJ.


The plaintiff, Melvin Schmidt, has appealed from the order of the Workers' Compensation Court dismissing his application for rehearing.

The record shows that following a hearing before a single judge of the Workers' Compensation Court, the plaintiff's petition for compensation was dismissed on June 18, 1990. On July 3, 1990, the plaintiff filed an application for rehearing in the compensation court.

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-179 (Reissue 1988) requires that applications for rehearing must be filed within 14 days after the date of the order of the single judge of the compensation court. In this case the application for rehearing was filed on the 15th day after the order of the single judge and thus was out of time. As stated in Dolner v. Peter Kiewit Sons Co., 143 Neb. 384, 387, 9 N.W.2d 483, 485 (1943):

The failure to file the application for rehearing within the statutory 14-day period caused the order of dismissal of the compensation judge to become "conclusive upon all parties at interest." See Duering v. Village of Upland, 125 Neb. 659, 251 N.W. 819; Swanson v. Village of Shickley, 125 Neb. 664, 251 N.W. 821.

The plaintiff contends, however, that a plaintiff may appeal directly to this court from the order of a single judge and he was not required to first request a rehearing before a three-judge panel of the compensation court.

There are no provisions in the statutes for a direct appeal to this court from the order of a single judge nor any procedures for such an appeal. Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-182 (Reissue 1988) states that a party in interest may appeal to this court after rehearing within 30 days of the compensation court's order on rehearing. It does not provide for an appeal to this court from the order of a single judge.

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-185 (Reissue 1988) provides the procedure for appeal to this court from the compensation court. It states:

Any appeal from the judgment of the Nebraska Workers' Compensation Court after a rehearing shall be prosecuted and the procedure . . . shall be in accordance with the general laws of the state and procedures regulating appeals in actions at law from the district courts to the Supreme Court . . . . The proceedings to obtain a reversal, vacation, or modification of judgments, awards, or final orders made by the compensation court after a rehearing shall be by filing in the office of the clerk of the Nebraska Workers' Compensation Court within thirty days after the rendition of such judgment or decree, or the making of such final order, a notice of intention to prosecute such appeal . . . .

The statutory provisions are clear that any party who refuses to accept the ruling of the single judge after the original hearing may file an application for rehearing before a three-judge panel within 14 days after the date of the single judge's order. If a claimant does not file an application for a rehearing with the compensation court within 14 days after the date of the single judge's order, the order becomes conclusive and final. See, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-170 (Reissue 1988); Dolner v. Peter Kiewit Sons Co., supra.

Because the plaintiff failed to file his application for rehearing within the 14-day period provided in 48-179, the three-judge panel was without jurisdiction to hear the case, and the compensation court did not err by dismissing his application.

The judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

BOSLAUGH, J., participating on briefs.


Summaries of

Schmidt v. Shoftstall Alfalfa

Supreme Court of Nebraska
Oct 11, 1991
239 Neb. 248 (Neb. 1991)
Case details for

Schmidt v. Shoftstall Alfalfa

Case Details

Full title:MELVIN SCHMIDT, APPELLANT, v. SHOFTSTALL ALFALFA ET AL., APPELLEES

Court:Supreme Court of Nebraska

Date published: Oct 11, 1991

Citations

239 Neb. 248 (Neb. 1991)
475 N.W.2d 523

Citing Cases

Lyle v. Drivers Management Inc.

Thus, the question is not so much whether the order of vacation was a final order, but, rather, whether the…

Lopez v. IBP, Inc.

[3, 4] Section 48-170 is clear that any party who wishes to appeal the order of a single judge of the…