Opinion
March 28, 1991
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.).
In this wrongful death action, it is undisputed that much of the recovery for wrongful death was attributable to losses not yet sustained on the judgment date. Defendant Presbyterian Hospital maintains that no pre-judgment interest should have been awarded on such future damages, despite the unequivocal language of EPTL 5-4.3.
The Supreme Court properly rejected this argument. EPTL 5-4.3 "provides for interest on the `principal sum recovered' without distinguishing between prejudgment and postjudgment losses of future income." (Soulier v Hughes, 119 A.D.2d 951, 954; and see, Milbrandt v Green Refractories Co., 167 A.D.2d 845.) In light of the clear and unambiguous language of the statute, we note, but decline to follow, the contrary view expressed by the United States Court of Appeals in Woodling v Garrett Corp. ( 813 F.2d 543). We further note that the jury, in the instant case, was presented with the testimony of an economist who discounted the value of damages to their present value.
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Rosenberger, Wallach, Kupferman and Smith, JJ.