From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schmeideberg v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Apr 2, 1969
438 S.W.2d 812 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969)

Opinion

No. 41980.

April 2, 1969.

Appeal from the 178th Judicial District Court, Harris County, Dan E. Walton, J.

No attorney on appeal.

Carol S. Vance, Dist. Atty., James C. Brough and Wells Stewart, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, and Jim D. vollers, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


OPINION


The conviction is for robbery by assault with two prior convictions for non-capital felonies alleged for enhancement; the punishment, life.

The appellant did not comply with Sec. 9 of Art. 40.09, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P., in that he did not file a brief in the trial court setting forth the grounds of error of which he desires to complain on appeal. Hill v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 403 S.W.2d 797; Yarbrough v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 408 S.W.2d 230; Melick v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 409 S.W.2d 412; Dewitt v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 409 S.W.2d 852; Ochoa v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 424 S.W.2d 642.

The docket sheet recites the following:

"Defendant appeared in person with his attorney of choice, S. John Odom, and state appeared by James C. Brough, Assit. District Attorney, Harris County, Texas, for arguments on briefs on appeal. Attorney S. John Odom advised Court that he had intentionally and purposefully omitted the filing of brief for defendant. The defendant being so advised persisted

in advising court that atty. S. John Odom was still his attorney of choice on appeal."

Nothing appears in the record which we should consider under the provisions of Section 13 of Art. 40.09, supra.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Schmeideberg v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Apr 2, 1969
438 S.W.2d 812 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969)
Case details for

Schmeideberg v. State

Case Details

Full title:Lawrence Pat SCHMEIDEBERG, Appellee. v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Apr 2, 1969

Citations

438 S.W.2d 812 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969)