From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schisler v. Rizio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 15, 2014
6:14-CV-0793 (GTS/TWD) (N.D.N.Y. Oct. 15, 2014)

Opinion

6:14-CV-0793 (GTS/TWD)

10-15-2014

WILLIAM G. SCHISLER, SR., Plaintiff, v. RONALD RIZIO; and SHERRI RIZIO, Defendants.

APPEARANCES: WILLIAM G. SCHISLER, SR. Plaintiff, Pro Se 1010 Green Street Utica, New York 13502


APPEARANCES: WILLIAM G. SCHISLER, SR.
Plaintiff, Pro Se
1010 Green Street
Utica, New York 13502
GLENN T. SUDDABY, United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER

Currently before the Court, in this pro se disability discrimination action filed by William G. Schisler, Sr. ("Plaintiff") against the two above-captioned private individuals ("Defendants"), are (1) United States Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks' Report-Recommendation recommending that Plaintiff's Complaint be sua sponte dismissed with prejudice; and (2) Plaintiff's Objection to the Report-Recommendation. (Dkt. Nos. 5, 7.) After carefully reviewing the relevant filings in this action, the Court can find no error in the Report-Recommendation, clear or otherwise: Magistrate Judge Dancks employed the proper standards, accurately recited the facts, and reasonably applied the law to those facts. As a result, the Court accepts and adopts the Report-Recommendation for the reasons stated therein. (Dkt. No. 5.)

ACCORDINGLY, it is

ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Dancks' Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 5) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is sus sponte DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Dated: October 15, 2014

Syracuse, New York

/s/_________

Hon. Glenn T. Suddaby

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Schisler v. Rizio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 15, 2014
6:14-CV-0793 (GTS/TWD) (N.D.N.Y. Oct. 15, 2014)
Case details for

Schisler v. Rizio

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM G. SCHISLER, SR., Plaintiff, v. RONALD RIZIO; and SHERRI RIZIO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Oct 15, 2014

Citations

6:14-CV-0793 (GTS/TWD) (N.D.N.Y. Oct. 15, 2014)

Citing Cases

Amato v. McGinty

Put simply, Ingram and Cocose are private individuals not subject to the ADA. See Schisler v. Rizio, No.…