From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schindler v. Ceo P'ship doing Bus. as Verizon Wireless

Supreme Court of New York
Dec 9, 2021
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 6931 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2021)

Opinion

Appeal No. 14824 Index No. 158735/19M-03633 Case No. 2021-01097

12-09-2021

Jane Schindler, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Cellco Partnership Doing Business as Verizon Wireless, Defendant-Respondent, John/Jane Doe Nos. 1 through 3, etc., Defendant. Appeal No. 14824&M-03633 Case No. 2021-01097

Hantman & Associates, New York (Robert J. Hantman of counsel), for appellant. Lowenstein Sandler LLP, New York (Gavin J. Rooney of counsel), for respondent.


Hantman & Associates, New York (Robert J. Hantman of counsel), for appellant.

Lowenstein Sandler LLP, New York (Gavin J. Rooney of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Kapnick, J.P., Moulton, González, Rodriguez, Pitt, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul A. Goetz, J.), entered September 21, 2020, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted the motion of defendant Cellco Partnership doing business as Verizon Wireless to compel arbitration, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The sole issue before this Court is whether the issue of arbitrability was properly delegated to the arbitrator. We find that it was. The record supports a conclusion that plaintiff was a Verizon Wireless customer, and that she voluntarily accepted the terms of the Verizon Customer Agreement and the arbitration provision contained within it. While there is generally a presumption that the issue of arbitrability will be determined by the courts, the arbitrator decides the issue where the parties evince a "clear and unmistakable agreement to arbitrate arbitrability as part of their alternative dispute resolution choice" (Matter of Smith Barney Shearson Inc. v Sacharow, 91 N.Y.2d 39, 46 [1997][internal quotation marks omitted]). The parties did, in fact, make that agreement, since the AAA rules were incorporated into the parties' arbitration provision (Anima Group, LLC v Emerald Expositions, LLC, 191 A.D.3d 572, 573 [1st Dept 2021]; Life Receivables Trust v Goshawk Syndicate 102 at Lloyd's, 66 A.D.3d 495, 496 [1st Dept 2009], affd 14 N.Y.3d 850 [2010]).

We have considered the parties' remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

M-03633 - Jane Schindler v Cellco Partnership doing business as Verizon Wireless

Motion for a stay of arbitration pending appeal, denied, as academic.


Summaries of

Schindler v. Ceo P'ship doing Bus. as Verizon Wireless

Supreme Court of New York
Dec 9, 2021
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 6931 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2021)
Case details for

Schindler v. Ceo P'ship doing Bus. as Verizon Wireless

Case Details

Full title:Jane Schindler, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Cellco Partnership Doing Business…

Court:Supreme Court of New York

Date published: Dec 9, 2021

Citations

2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 6931 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2021)