From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schickel v. Troutman

Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 9, 2019
140 S. Ct. 649 (2019)

Summary

reaffirming wariness of speaker-based restrictions that are "nothing more than content-based restrictions in disguise," but nonetheless concluding that Kentucky's gift ban provision served an anti-corruption purpose unrelated to content of expression and was justified without reference to the content of the gifts regulated

Summary of this case from Infocision Mgmt. Corp. v. Griswold

Opinion

No. 19-458

12-09-2019

John SCHICKEL, et al., Petitioners v. George C. TROUTMAN, et al.


Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.


Summaries of

Schickel v. Troutman

Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 9, 2019
140 S. Ct. 649 (2019)

reaffirming wariness of speaker-based restrictions that are "nothing more than content-based restrictions in disguise," but nonetheless concluding that Kentucky's gift ban provision served an anti-corruption purpose unrelated to content of expression and was justified without reference to the content of the gifts regulated

Summary of this case from Infocision Mgmt. Corp. v. Griswold
Case details for

Schickel v. Troutman

Case Details

Full title:John SCHICKEL, et al., Petitioners v. George C. TROUTMAN, et al.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States.

Date published: Dec 9, 2019

Citations

140 S. Ct. 649 (2019)
205 L. Ed. 2d 388

Citing Cases

Infocision Mgmt. Corp. v. Griswold

Like the Utah Act reviewed in Giani , § 6-16-104.6(10) serves an antifraud purpose unrelated to the content…

Chrysafis v. Marks

Hence, plaintiffs’ purported reliance on an unrealistically elevated standard for filing a challenge or their…