From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schenker v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
May 15, 2018
No. 73367 (Nev. App. May. 15, 2018)

Opinion

No. 73367

05-15-2018

KARL WILLIAM SCHENKER, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Karl William Schenker appeals from a district court order denying the post-sentence motion to withdraw a guilty plea filed on October 31, 2016. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; A. William Maupin, Senior Justice.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument. NRAP 34(f)(3).

Schenker claims the district court erred by applying Harris v. State, 130 Nev. 435, 329 P.3d 619 (2014), to his motion to withdraw the guilty plea because his motion was raised pursuant to NRS 176.515(1). In Harris, the Nevada Supreme Court held that "a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus provides the exclusive remedy for a challenge to the validity of the guilty plea made after sentencing for persons in custody on the conviction being challenged." Id. at 448, 329 P.3d at 628.

Schenker's motion challenged the validity of his guilty plea; therefore, the district court properly construed the motion as a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus and required Schenker to cure the procedural defects in the petition within a reasonable amount of time. See id. Schenker made no attempt to cure the petition's procedural defects, and we conclude the district court did not err in denying the petition as procedurally barred. Accordingly, we

Schenker's petition was untimely because it was filed more than seven years after the entry of the judgment of conviction on November 14, 2008. See NRS 34.726(1); Dickerson v. State, 114 Nev. 1084, 1087, 967 P.3d 1132, 1133-34 (1998) (discussing the proper date for measuring the timeliness of a habeas petition when the direct appeal was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction); Schenker v. State, Docket No. 53006 (Order Dismissing Appeal, February 26, 2009). --------

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Silver

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Gibbons cc: Chief Judge, Second Judicial District Court

Hon. A. William Maupin, Senior Justice

Karl William Schenker

Attorney General/Carson City

Washoe County District Attorney

Washoe District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Schenker v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
May 15, 2018
No. 73367 (Nev. App. May. 15, 2018)
Case details for

Schenker v. State

Case Details

Full title:KARL WILLIAM SCHENKER, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: May 15, 2018

Citations

No. 73367 (Nev. App. May. 15, 2018)

Citing Cases

Schenker v. State

There, rather than attempt to cure his defects, Schenker emphasized that he was seeking relief per NRS…