From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scharmann's Inc. v. 388 West Broadway

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 2, 1999
258 A.D.2d 262 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

February 2, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.).


The motion was properly denied on the ground that plaintiff served the order to show cause not on defendant landlord personally, as the court specifically directed, but on the managing agent of the building in which the leased premises are located. "The method of service provided for in an order to show cause is jurisdictional in nature and must be strictly complied with". ( Matter of Zambelli v. Dillon, 242 A.D.2d 353.) Defendant's proper address was specified in a document attached to the notice of default. We also note defendant's status as a limited liability company and the impropriety of the service made under Limited Liability Company Law § 303.

Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Williams, Wallach and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Scharmann's Inc. v. 388 West Broadway

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 2, 1999
258 A.D.2d 262 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Scharmann's Inc. v. 388 West Broadway

Case Details

Full title:SCHARMANN'S INC., Appellant, v. 388 WEST BROADWAY, L. L. C., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 2, 1999

Citations

258 A.D.2d 262 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
685 N.Y.S.2d 33

Citing Cases

Wenz v. Globecomm Sys., Inc.

At oral argument held on November 13, 2012, the return date of the motion, it was admitted by the plaintiffs…

U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Feliciano

“ ‘The method of service provided for in an order to show cause is jurisdictional in nature and must be…