From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schaible v. Cincinnati

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 14, 1952
106 N.E.2d 81 (Ohio 1952)

Opinion

No. 32866

Decided May 14, 1952.

Appeal — Order granting motion for new trial — No abuse of discretion — No judgment or final order.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton county.

This action was instituted in the Court of Common Pleas to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained as the result of a sidewalk and park strip being permitted to become and remain in a defective condition.

At the conclusion of the plaintiff's case the court granted defendant's motion for a directed verdict and entered judgment for defendant. Plaintiff filed a motion to set aside the verdict and judgment and for a new trial, on five separate grounds. The motion was granted but the journal entry does not disclose upon which ground or grounds the court based its order, and no request to state the grounds was made, as authorized by Section 12223-2, General Code.

Defendant appealed to the Court of Appeals from the order setting aside the verdict and judgment and granting a new trial. The Court of Appeals, on motion to dismiss the appeal, found "that granting of the motion for a new trial is not a judgment or final order and that the trial court in granting the motion for a new trial did not abuse its discretion," and dismissed the appeal.

The allowance of a motion to certify the record brings the cause to this court for review.

Mr. John J. Rivers, for appellee.

Mr. Henry M. Bruestle, city solicitor, Mr. J.B. Grause, Jr., and Mr. Maurice W. Jacobs, for appellant.


Since the journal entry of the trial court setting aside the verdict and judgment and granting a new trial does not disclose the ground or grounds for such order, and an examination of the record fails to disclose an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court in making the order, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. See Schwer, Admx., v. New York, Chicago St. Louis Rd. Co., 156 Ohio St. 115, 100 N.E.2d 197, and Green v. Acacia Mutual Life ins. Co., 156 Ohio St. 1, 100 N.E.2d 211.

Judgment affirmed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, MIDDLETON, TAFT, MATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Schaible v. Cincinnati

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 14, 1952
106 N.E.2d 81 (Ohio 1952)
Case details for

Schaible v. Cincinnati

Case Details

Full title:SCHAIBLE, APPELLEE v. CITY OF CINCINNATI, APPELLANT

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: May 14, 1952

Citations

106 N.E.2d 81 (Ohio 1952)
106 N.E.2d 81

Citing Cases

State v. Huntsman

That question, prior to the Price case had been presented to this court on numerous former occasions, but…

Lehman v. Haynam

Unlike in Green v. Acacia Mutual Life Ins. Co., supra, it does not appear from the journal entry of the trial…