Summary
finding RFC limiting plaintiff to work requiring no close contact with general public, only occasional interaction with coworkers, and no more than simple, repetitive tasks adequately accounted for his mental impairments, including depression, anxiety, and cognitive disorder
Summary of this case from Nathan K. v. SaulOpinion
No. 6:13-cv-00157-JE
02-03-2014
DEBRA L. SCHAEFER, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN COLVIN, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant.
Richard F. McGinty McGinty & Belcher, PC P.O. Attorney for Plaintiff Adrian L. Brown U.S. Attorney's Office District of Oregon Gerald J. Hill Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel Attorneys for Defendant
ORDER
Richard F. McGinty
McGinty & Belcher, PC
P.O.
Attorney for Plaintiff Adrian L. Brown
U.S. Attorney's Office
District of Oregon
Gerald J. Hill
Social Security Administration
Office of the General Counsel
Attorneys for Defendant HERNANDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Jelderks issued a Findings and Recommendation (#20) on January 8, 2014, in which he recommends that the Court affirm the Commissioner's final decision. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Jelderks's Findings and Recommendation (#20). Accordingly, the Commissioner's final decision is affirmed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
____________________
MARCO A. HERNANDEZ
United States District Judge