From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schackman v. Arnebergh

U.S.
May 29, 1967
387 U.S. 427 (1967)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.

No. 1186.

Decided May 29, 1967.

258 F. Supp. 983, 996, appeal dismissed.

Burton Marks for appellants.

Roger Arnebergh, pro se, Bourke Jones and Robert B. Burns for appellees Arnebergh et al.; Harold W. Kennedy, George Wakefield and Martin E. Weekes for appellees Younger et al.; and Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, pro se, and A. Barry Cappello, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee Lynch.


Appellants seek review by this Court of the refusal by the District Court to convene a three-judge District Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2281-2284. We have held that such review is available in the Court of Appeals, Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. Epstein, 370 U.S. 713, and not in this Court. Buchanan v. Rhodes, 385 U.S. 3.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Schackman v. Arnebergh

U.S.
May 29, 1967
387 U.S. 427 (1967)
Case details for

Schackman v. Arnebergh

Case Details

Full title:SCHACKMAN ET AL. v . ARNEBERGH, CITY ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES…

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 29, 1967

Citations

387 U.S. 427 (1967)

Citing Cases

Latham v. Tynan

However vexatious the question in some circumstances, there would now seem to be no question that the…

Kirkland v. Wallace

Where a case involving the validity of a state statute is disposed of by a single federal district judge…