From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scarborough v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jan 30, 1986
507 A.2d 141 (D.C. 1986)

Opinion

No. 84-754.

January 30, 1986.

Geoffrey D. Allen, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Michael W. Farrell, Asst. U.S. Atty., for appellee.

Before PRYOR, Chief Judge, and NEBEKER, MACK, NEWMAN, FERREN, BELSON, TERRY, ROGERS and STEADMAN, Associate Judges.


ORDER


On consideration of appellant's petition for rehearing en banc, and the opposition thereto; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

ORDERED that appellant's petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of August 7, 1985, are hereby vacated. The Clerk of the Superior Court is directed to return the certified copy of the opinion and judgment and the mandate of this court heretofore issued on October 1, 1985. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the business of the court permits. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before February 7, 1986.

NEBEKER, Associate Judge, voted to deny rehearing en banc.


Summaries of

Scarborough v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jan 30, 1986
507 A.2d 141 (D.C. 1986)
Case details for

Scarborough v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Eddie M. SCARBOROUGH, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: Jan 30, 1986

Citations

507 A.2d 141 (D.C. 1986)

Citing Cases

Scarborough v. U.S.

The division premised its opinion on the second holding of Barkley v. United States, 455 A.2d 412, 415-16…