S.C. v. A.C

Full title: S.C., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. A.C., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

Court: Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: May 3, 1974

128 N.J. Super. 198 (App. Div. 1974)

319 A.2d 733

Opinion

Argued April 23, 1974 —

Decided May 3, 1974.

Appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Before Judges CARTON, LORA and SEIDMAN.

Mr. Monroe Ackerman argued the cause for appellant ( Messrs. Rudd and Ackerman, attorneys; Mr. Charles E. Carlson, Jr. on the brief).

Mr. Everett M. Scherer argued the cause for respondent ( Messrs. Riker, Danzig, Scherer and Brown, attorneys; Mr. Thomas C.C. Humick on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Chancery Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the written opinion of Judge Consodine reported at 123 N.J. Super. 566 (Ch.Div. 1973).