From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Savitz-Denbigh Co. v. Bigelow

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 6, 1928
140 A. 921 (N.J. 1928)

Opinion

Submitted October 28, 1927 —

Decided February 6, 1928.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 4 N.J. Mis. R. 819.

For the respondent, Thomas Brunetto.

For the appellants, Jerome T. Congleton.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Savitz-Denbigh Co. v. Bigelow

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 6, 1928
140 A. 921 (N.J. 1928)
Case details for

Savitz-Denbigh Co. v. Bigelow

Case Details

Full title:SAVITZ-DENBIGH COMPANY, A CORPORATION, RESPONDENT, v. FREDERIC BIGELOW…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Feb 6, 1928

Citations

140 A. 921 (N.J. 1928)
140 A. 921

Citing Cases

Vine v. Board of Adjustment of Ridgewood

Bauer v. Boardof Fire and Police Commissioners, 102 N.J.L. 235. While such filling stations are a public…

Higgs v. City of Martin

An ordinance which prohibits the establishment of service stations within three hundred feet of any church,…