From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Save Our Cumberland Mountains, Inc, v. Hodel

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Oct 14, 1987
830 F.2d 1182 (D.C. Cir. 1987)

Opinion

No. 85-5984.

October 14, 1987.

Before WALD, Chief Judge, ROBINSON, MIKVA, EDWARDS, RUTH BADER GINSBURG, BORK, STARR, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS and D.H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

Appellees' suggestion for rehearing en banc has been circulated to the full Court. The taking of a vote thereon was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the Court in regular active service voted in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that appellees' suggestion for rehearing en banc is granted.

A future order will govern further proceedings herein.

Circuit Judge BORK did not participate in this order.


Summaries of

Save Our Cumberland Mountains, Inc, v. Hodel

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Oct 14, 1987
830 F.2d 1182 (D.C. Cir. 1987)
Case details for

Save Our Cumberland Mountains, Inc, v. Hodel

Case Details

Full title:SAVE OUR CUMBERLAND MOUNTAINS, INC., ET AL. v. DONALD HODEL, SECRETARY OF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Oct 14, 1987

Citations

830 F.2d 1182 (D.C. Cir. 1987)

Citing Cases

Thompson v. Kennickell

We held in Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 746 F.2d 4 (D.C. Cir. 1984), that the presumptively reasonable…

Student Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey, Inc. v. AT & T Bell Laboratories

Id. at 1160. In Save Our Cumberland Mountains, Inc. v. Hodel, 826 F.2d 43, rehearing en banc granted, 830…