From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saunders v. Russell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Dec 9, 2015
Case No. 4:12 CV 2225 RWS (E.D. Mo. Dec. 9, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 4:12 CV 2225 RWS

12-09-2015

JEWELL D. SAUNDERS, Petitioner, v. TERRY RUSSELL, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before me on the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by Petitioner Jewell D. Saunders. I referred this matter to United States Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen for a report and recommendation on all dispositive matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). On October 30, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed his recommendation that Saunders' habeas petition should be denied.

Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation were due to be filed by November 14, 2015. As of the date of this order, Saunders has not filed any objection to the Report and Recommendation. After careful consideration, I will adopt and sustain the thorough reasoning of the Magistrate Judge's report and I will deny Saunders' habeas petition for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation.

I have also considered whether to issue a certificate of appealability. To grant a certificate of appealability, the Court must find a substantial showing of the denial of a federal constitutional right. See Tiedeman v. Benson, 122 F.3d 518, 522 (8th Cir. 1997). A substantial showing is a showing that issues are debatable among reasonable jurists, a court could resolve the issues differently, or the issues deserve further proceedings. Cox v. Norris, 133 F.3d 565, 569 (8th Cir. 1997) (citing Flieger v. Delo, 16 F.3d 878, 882-83 (8th Cir. 1994)). Because petitioner has not made such a showing in this case, I will not issue a certificate of appealability.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judge Bodenhausens' Report and Recommendation filed on October 30, 2015 is adopted and sustained in its entirety.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner Jewell D. Saunders' Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability.

A separate Judgment in accordance with this Memorandum and Order is entered this same date.

/s/_________

RODNEY W. SIPPEL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 9th day of December, 2015.

The Missouri Department of Corrections shows that Petitioner's name is Jewell Saunders. (Resp. Exh. 1 at 107) However, some of the pleadings in state court refer to Petitioner as Jewell Sanders. This Memorandum and Order will refer to Petitioner as "Saunders."


Summaries of

Saunders v. Russell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Dec 9, 2015
Case No. 4:12 CV 2225 RWS (E.D. Mo. Dec. 9, 2015)
Case details for

Saunders v. Russell

Case Details

Full title:JEWELL D. SAUNDERS, Petitioner, v. TERRY RUSSELL, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 9, 2015

Citations

Case No. 4:12 CV 2225 RWS (E.D. Mo. Dec. 9, 2015)

Citing Cases

Ashworth v. Cole

The complainant knew, or was charged with knowledge, of the amount of her debt, and it was not necessary for…