From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saunders v. Champlain Bus Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 24, 1943
266 App. Div. 938 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)

Opinion

September 24, 1943.


Defendant has appealed from judgments in favor of the plaintiffs in negligence actions and from orders denying its motions for new trials. On March 2, 1941, the plaintiff Roner was operating a Ford automobile, owned by him, in a westerly direction on State Street in the city of Schenectady. The other plaintiffs were passengers in that car. The car came into collision with the bus owned and operated by defendant, as a result of which plaintiffs were injured. They brought these actions to recover damages. The case was before this court on a former appeal ( 263 App. Div. 683). At that time the judgments in favor of the plaintiffs were reversed and new trials ordered. Plaintiffs have again recovered and defendant has again appealed. Defendant concedes on this appeal that the only question involved is whether or not the verdicts are excessive. The evidence amply sustains the verdicts of the jury. Judgments and orders affirmed, with one bill of costs to plaintiffs. All concur.


Summaries of

Saunders v. Champlain Bus Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 24, 1943
266 App. Div. 938 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)
Case details for

Saunders v. Champlain Bus Corporation

Case Details

Full title:HAZEL SAUNDERS, Respondent, v. CHAMPLAIN BUS CORPORATION, Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 24, 1943

Citations

266 App. Div. 938 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)