From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saulsberry v. FedEx Express

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 14, 2013
Case No. 11-02581 (W.D. Tenn. Feb. 14, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 11-02581

02-14-2013

PERNELL SAULSBERRY, Plaintiff, v. FEDEX EXPRESS, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Claxton's Report and Recommendation [Docket #43] filed January 15, 2013. The Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment be granted. Plaintiff filed objections on January 29, 2013.

Having reviewed the file, the Report and Recommendation and the objections the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and this case is CLOSED.

____________

Arthur J. Tarnow

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Saulsberry v. FedEx Express

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 14, 2013
Case No. 11-02581 (W.D. Tenn. Feb. 14, 2013)
Case details for

Saulsberry v. FedEx Express

Case Details

Full title:PERNELL SAULSBERRY, Plaintiff, v. FEDEX EXPRESS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 14, 2013

Citations

Case No. 11-02581 (W.D. Tenn. Feb. 14, 2013)

Citing Cases

Rim v. Lab. Mgmt. Consultants, Inc.

Moreover, even though the written discipline indicates that Rim could be terminated upon three disciplinary…