From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sauls v. Valenzuela

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 7, 2014
NO. CV 13-2125-JFW (AS) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2014)

Opinion

NO. CV 13-2125-JFW (AS)

08-07-2014

DAVID LEE SAULS, Petitioner, v. E. VALENZUELA, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Objections were directed, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying and dismissing the Petition with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the Judgment herein on counsel for Petitioner and counsel for Respondent.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

DATED: August 7, 2014.

/s/_________

JOHN F. WALTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Sauls v. Valenzuela

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 7, 2014
NO. CV 13-2125-JFW (AS) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2014)
Case details for

Sauls v. Valenzuela

Case Details

Full title:DAVID LEE SAULS, Petitioner, v. E. VALENZUELA, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 7, 2014

Citations

NO. CV 13-2125-JFW (AS) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2014)

Citing Cases

Woods v. Barnes

\\ \\ \\ \\ \\ B. Prosecutorial Misconduct Having reached this conclusion, it is unnecessary to address…