From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sarno v. Gulf Refining Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 9, 1925
102 N.J.L. 223 (N.J. 1925)

Opinion

Argued May 29, 1925 —

Decided September 9, 1925.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 99 N.J.L. 340.

For the appellant, Gross Gross ( Merritt Lane and Benjamin Gross, of counsel).

For the respondent, Mark Townsend, Jr., and William H. Speer and William J. Guthrie (of the Pennsylvania bar), of counsel.


The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Minturn in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — TRENCHARD, KALISCH, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Sarno v. Gulf Refining Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 9, 1925
102 N.J.L. 223 (N.J. 1925)
Case details for

Sarno v. Gulf Refining Co.

Case Details

Full title:RAFFAELE SARNO, APPELLANT, v. GULF REFINING COMPANY, RESPONDENT

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Sep 9, 1925

Citations

102 N.J.L. 223 (N.J. 1925)
130 A. 919

Citing Cases

Vreeland v. Wilkinson, Gaddis Co.

The issue thus presented is a narrow one. In view of the total absence of any proof that the work Sellito…

Terranella v. Union Bldg. and Construction Co.

Where the work to be done is not per se a nuisance and injury results from the negligence of an independent…