From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sargent v. Johns

United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division
Dec 14, 2010
No. 5:10-HC-2196-D (E.D.N.C. Dec. 14, 2010)

Opinion

No. 5:10-HC-2196-D.

December 14, 2010


ORDER


On September 3, 2010, Frank: Sargent ("Sargent" or "petitioner") filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [D.E. 1]. On September 3, 2010, Sargent filed a motion for expedited calendar setting [D.E. 4]. On December 1, 2010, Sargent filed a motion to dismiss his petition [D.E. 6].

A petitioner may dismiss an action voluntarily, without an order of the court, by filing a notice of dismissal at any time before service by the adverse party of an answer or a motion for summary judgment. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Otherwise, an action shall not be dismissed on the petitioner's request except upon order of the court. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2). Respondent has not filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Thus, the court will allow the voluntary dismissal.

Petitioner's motion for voluntary dismissal without prejudice [D.E. 6] is ALLOWED. Petitioner's motion for expedited calendar setting [D.E. 4] is DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case.

SO ORDERED. This 14 day of December 2010.


Summaries of

Sargent v. Johns

United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division
Dec 14, 2010
No. 5:10-HC-2196-D (E.D.N.C. Dec. 14, 2010)
Case details for

Sargent v. Johns

Case Details

Full title:FRANK SARGENT, Petitioner, v. TRACY W. JOHNS, WARDEN, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division

Date published: Dec 14, 2010

Citations

No. 5:10-HC-2196-D (E.D.N.C. Dec. 14, 2010)

Citing Cases

Schwoyer's Estate

Orrin E. Boyle, for appellant. — An attorney cannot, without his client's consent, divulge matters which were…

Sweeney v. Green

It is the communication which is privileged, not the fact of employment. See 5 Wigmore on Evidence, 2d Ed.,…