From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sardinia v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 31, 1964
162 So. 2d 328 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

Opinion

No. 63-754.

March 31, 1964.

Appeal from the Criminal Court of Record for Dade County, Gene Williams, J.

Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender, and W. Eugene Neill, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

James W. Kynes, Jr., Atty. Gen., and Leonard R. Mellon, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C.J., and CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.


This is an appeal from a denial of an application for relief pursuant to the provisions of Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1 F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. We affirm.

It appears, from the transcript of the trial proceedings, that the appellant had counsel at the time of the trials which resulted in the convictions involved here. Therefore, having had counsel at the time of his trials [even though he may have plead guilty] there is no merit to his contention that he was denied due process because counsel could have made appropriate motions to have the pleas of guilty set aside. See: § 909.13, Fla. Stat., F.S.A.; Jackman v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 160 So.2d 554, and authorities cited therein.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Sardinia v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 31, 1964
162 So. 2d 328 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)
Case details for

Sardinia v. State

Case Details

Full title:LIONEL STANLEY SARDINIA, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 31, 1964

Citations

162 So. 2d 328 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

Citing Cases

Smith v. State

After the taking of testimony, he was adjudged guilty and sentenced. We find nothing in this record to…

Williams v. State

The appellant originally pleaded not guilty and subsequently, when represented by counsel of his own…