Opinion
No. 10-P-69.
June 8, 2011.
DECISIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28.
Judgment reversed as to counts I (breach of contract) and IV (breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing). Judgment affirmed as to counts II (unjust enrichment), III (estoppel) and V (breach of c. 93A). Case remanded for further proceedings consistent with the memorandum and order of the Appeals Court.