From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SANZ v. PROFESSIONAL UNDERWRITERS

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 8, 1990
560 So. 2d 1254 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Summary

holding that a corporate director and shareholder, who had executed a separate personal guaranty, providing that it would remain in effect until written notice of termination was received, remained liable under the guaranty even after his resignation as director and shareholder where he failed to specifically terminate the guaranty

Summary of this case from Nelson v. Ameriquest Technologies

Opinion

No. 88-2800.

April 10, 1990. Rehearing Denied June 8, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Jon Gordon, J.

Horton, Perse Ginsberg, and Arnold R. Ginsberg, Miami, and Krongold Bass, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Touby Smith DeMahy Drake, and Kenneth R. Drake, Miami, for appellee.

Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and GERSTEN, JJ.


Appellant, Justo Sanz, appeals a partial summary judgment on liability in favor of appellee, Professional Underwriters Insurance Agency, on appellee's claim against appellant for enforcement of a personal guaranty. We affirm.

Appellant was a director and shareholder of Trail Underwriters, Inc. Appellant executed a separate personal guaranty on behalf of Trail Underwriters, Inc., for performance of a management agreement between Trail Underwriters, Inc. and appellee. Appellant's separate personal guaranty agreement unequivocally provided that the guaranty would continue to be in effect until appellee received "written notice by registered mail terminating it as to future transactions."

Appellant resigned as a director and shareholder of Trail Underwriters, Inc. and notified appellee. Appellant did not, however, specifically terminate his separate personal guaranty agreement. After appellant resigned, appellee brought a breach of contract action against Trail Underwriters, Inc. and sought recovery from appellant based on the personal guaranty.

The termination of an interest in a corporation, in and of itself, does not also terminate liability under a separate personal guaranty agreement unless the termination provisions of the agreement are complied with. See Kerr-McGee Chemical Corporation v. CHB Farms, Inc., 340 So.2d 483 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976), cert. denied, 348 So.2d 946 (Fla. 1977). Thus, a personal guaranty continues until it is revoked. Causeway Lumber Company, Inc. v. King, 502 So.2d 80 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).

Because appellant failed to comply with the termination provision, we find that, as a matter of law, he was liable under his personal guaranty. Accordingly, we affirm.


Summaries of

SANZ v. PROFESSIONAL UNDERWRITERS

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 8, 1990
560 So. 2d 1254 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

holding that a corporate director and shareholder, who had executed a separate personal guaranty, providing that it would remain in effect until written notice of termination was received, remained liable under the guaranty even after his resignation as director and shareholder where he failed to specifically terminate the guaranty

Summary of this case from Nelson v. Ameriquest Technologies
Case details for

SANZ v. PROFESSIONAL UNDERWRITERS

Case Details

Full title:JUSTO SANZ, APPELLANT, v. PROFESSIONAL UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE AGENCY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 8, 1990

Citations

560 So. 2d 1254 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Nelson v. Ameriquest Technologies

Although we have located no Florida case which squarely addresses this issue, we believe that the more…

Leader Glob. Sols. LLC v. Yankelewitz

The writing requirement precludes waiver by implication, and Florida law enforces the termination provisions…