Santiago v. Sherman

Full title: ERNESTO SANTIAGO, Plaintiff, v. JAMES SHERMAN, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 25, 2007

Civil Action No. 05-153 Erie (W.D. Pa. Jan. 25, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-153 Erie.

January 25, 2007

MEMORANDUM ORDER

SEAN McLAUGHLIN, District Judge

This civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on May 17, 2005, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 38], filed on January 4, 2007, recommended that Defendants' motion to dismiss or alternatively for summary judgment [Doc. No. 33] be granted. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Plaintiff by certified mail and on Defendants. No objections were filed. Afterde novo review of the motion and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 25^th day of January, 2007;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants' motion to dismiss or alternatively for summary judgment [Doc. No. 33] is GRANTED.

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 38] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on January 4, 2007, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.