From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santiago v. Honeywell Int'l

United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Apr 18, 2022
16-cv-25359-COOKE/GOODMAN (S.D. Fla. Apr. 18, 2022)

Opinion

16-cv-25359-COOKE/GOODMAN

04-18-2022

KAREN SANTIAGO, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

MARCIA G. COOKE, United States District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before me upon the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of the Honorable Jonathan Goodman, U.S. Magistrate Judge, ECF No. 143, regarding the unopposed motion to tax costs and a bill of costs, ECF Nos. 136, 137.

In his R&R, Judge Goodman recommends that I grant in part and deny in part the motion. ECF No. 143 at 13. The parties have not filed objections to the R&R, and the time to do so has passed.

I have reviewed the motion to tax costs, the briefing and accompanying exhibits, Judge Goodman's R&R, the record, and the relevant legal authorities. Having done so, I find Judge Goodman's R&R to be clear, cogent, and compelling.

Accordingly, Judge Goodman's R&R is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED as the Order of this Court. It is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the motion to tax costs and bill of costs, ECF Nos. 136 and 137, are GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Court will award Defendant Honeywell International, Inc. $1, 940.80 in taxable costs, plus interest from the date of the final judgment.

DONE and ORDERED.

Copies furnished to:

Jonathan Goodman, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Counsel of record.


Summaries of

Santiago v. Honeywell Int'l

United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Apr 18, 2022
16-cv-25359-COOKE/GOODMAN (S.D. Fla. Apr. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Santiago v. Honeywell Int'l

Case Details

Full title:KAREN SANTIAGO, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Florida

Date published: Apr 18, 2022

Citations

16-cv-25359-COOKE/GOODMAN (S.D. Fla. Apr. 18, 2022)

Citing Cases

Claiborne v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

Further, the fact that a motion is unopposed does not compel the Court to grant it without considering its…

Blanco v. Samuel

v. M/Y Backstage, No. 13-20041-CIV, 2014 WL 12631667, at *3 (S.D. Fla. July 29, 2014); see also Barrera v.…