From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sankey v. Levy

Supreme Court of California
Mar 31, 1886
69 Cal. 244 (Cal. 1886)

Opinion

         Department One

         Application for a writ of mandate to the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco.

         COUNSEL:

         Samuel Sankey, in pro. per ., for Petitioner.

          Naphtaly, Freidenrich & Ackerman, for Respondent.


         OPINION

         THE COURT

         This is an application for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent to restore to the calendar of the Superior Court a case tried in that court some two years ago on appeal from a Justice's Court. The ground of the application is, that the Superior Court rendered judgment in the case without filing findings of fact. But at most this was but error, for the correction of which mandamus does not lie.

         Writ denied, and proceedings dismissed.


Summaries of

Sankey v. Levy

Supreme Court of California
Mar 31, 1886
69 Cal. 244 (Cal. 1886)
Case details for

Sankey v. Levy

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL SANKEY, Petitioner, v. WALTER H. LEVY, Judge of the Superior Court…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Mar 31, 1886

Citations

69 Cal. 244 (Cal. 1886)
10 P. 336

Citing Cases

Kerr v. Superior Court

Moreover, a mandate from this court to the respondent to do the formal act of issuing a citation would…

In re Estate of Sharp

         There is nothing contained in the provisions of sections 1465 et seq. of the Code of Civil Procedure…