From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanford v. Burge

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Sep 2, 2004
334 F. Supp. 2d 289 (E.D.N.Y. 2004)

Summary

adopting Report and Recommendation of Mag. Go

Summary of this case from Lancaster v. Capra

Opinion

No. 02 CV 2930 (NG) (MDG).

September 2, 2004

Joseph Sanford, pro se.

Queens County District Attorney's Office, by Donna Aldea, John M. Castellano, and Johnette Traill, for respondent.



ORDER


Petitioner's objections, dated June 8, 2004, to the February 27, 2004 Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Marilyn D. Go, magistrate judge, have been reviewed under the de novo standard of review. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 72 (b). The objections are without merit. Judge Go's thorough and thoughtful analysis of the issues before the court is hereby adopted by the court in its entirety. For the reasons stated by Judge Go, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.

Since petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability is denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sanford v. Burge

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Sep 2, 2004
334 F. Supp. 2d 289 (E.D.N.Y. 2004)

adopting Report and Recommendation of Mag. Go

Summary of this case from Lancaster v. Capra

adopting Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Marilyn D. Go

Summary of this case from Cardova v. Lavalley
Case details for

Sanford v. Burge

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH SANFORD, Petitioner, v. JOHN BURGE, Superintendent, Auburn…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Sep 2, 2004

Citations

334 F. Supp. 2d 289 (E.D.N.Y. 2004)

Citing Cases

Wright v. Duncan

Where the petitioner clearly complied with the applicable state procedural rule, the bar asserted by the…

Strzelecki v. Cunningham

" (Id. at 21; see also id. at 20-21 (asserting that a federal habeas court is to view the evidence in the…