From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sandoval v. Sodano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 21, 1989
147 A.D.2d 627 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

February 21, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Graci, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

This action was marked off the Trial Calendar in December 1983 when the infant plaintiff and his father failed to appear and could not be located. Indeed, the father deliberately concealed their whereabouts from counsel until sometime in November of 1986. Even if we were to insulate the infant plaintiff from the consequences of his father's acts in secreting him, the absence of any affidavit of merit compelled the denial of the plaintiff's renewed application to vacate his default and restore this case to the Trial Calendar (see, Amendolare v Piontkowski, 118 A.D.2d 529). Thompson, J.P., Kunzeman, Eiber, Spatt and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sandoval v. Sodano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 21, 1989
147 A.D.2d 627 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Sandoval v. Sodano

Case Details

Full title:ARTURO SANDOVAL, JR., Appellant, v. VINCENT SODANO, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 21, 1989

Citations

147 A.D.2d 627 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
538 N.Y.S.2d 35

Citing Cases

Vargas v. Flatbush Pest Control, Inc.

Moreover, the plaintiffs failed to offer any explanation for the default that led to the note of issue being…