From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sandhill Amusements, Inc. v. State

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Dec 14, 2012
366 N.C. 323 (N.C. 2012)

Summary

In Sandhill, by adopting the dissenting opinion, we held that this reference to skill and dexterity incorporates "the traditional distinction between a game of skill and a game of chance pursuant to state law" such that it prohibits sweepstakes conducted through video games in which "chance predominates over skill."

Summary of this case from Gift Surplus, LLC v. State ex rel. Cooper

Opinion

No. 170A11–2.

2012-12-14

SANDHILL AMUSEMENTS, INC.; Carolina Industrial Supplies; J & F Amusements, Inc.; J & J Vending, Inc.; Matthews Vending Co.; Patton Brothers, Inc.; Trent Brothers Music Co., Inc.; S & S Music Co., Inc.; Old North State Amusements, Inc.; and Uwharrie Fuels, LLC v. STATE of North Carolina; Governor Beverly Perdue, in her official capacity; North Carolina Department of Crime Control and Public Safety; Secretary of Crime Control and Public Safety Bryan E. Beatty, in his official capacity; Alcohol Law Enforcement Division; Director of Alcohol Law Enforcement Division William Chandler, in his official capacity.

Daughtry, Woodard, Lawrence & Starling, Smithfield, by Kelly K. Daughtry, for plaintiff-appellees. Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by John F. Maddrey, Solicitor General, and Hal F. Askins, Special Deputy Attorney General, for defendant-appellants.


Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A–30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ––– N.C.App. ––––, 724 S.E.2d 614 (2012), reversing an order entered on 29 November 2010 by Judge Paul C. Ridgeway in Superior Court, Wake County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 17 October 2012. Daughtry, Woodard, Lawrence & Starling, Smithfield, by Kelly K. Daughtry, for plaintiff-appellees. Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by John F. Maddrey, Solicitor General, and Hal F. Askins, Special Deputy Attorney General, for defendant-appellants.
PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in Hest Technologies, Inc. v. State ex rel. Perdue, ––– N.C. ––––, ––– S.E.2d ––––, 2012 WL 6218202 (2012), the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

REVERSED.


Summaries of

Sandhill Amusements, Inc. v. State

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Dec 14, 2012
366 N.C. 323 (N.C. 2012)

In Sandhill, by adopting the dissenting opinion, we held that this reference to skill and dexterity incorporates "the traditional distinction between a game of skill and a game of chance pursuant to state law" such that it prohibits sweepstakes conducted through video games in which "chance predominates over skill."

Summary of this case from Gift Surplus, LLC v. State ex rel. Cooper
Case details for

Sandhill Amusements, Inc. v. State

Case Details

Full title:SANDHILL AMUSEMENTS, INC.; Carolina Industrial Supplies; J & F Amusements…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Date published: Dec 14, 2012

Citations

366 N.C. 323 (N.C. 2012)
366 N.C. 323

Citing Cases

Hest Techs., Inc. v. State

Plaintiffs argue that the law prohibits the video games involved in their sweepstakes systems, and that these…

Gift Surplus, LLC v. State ex rel. Cooper

One of the plaintiffs here, Sandhill Amusements, was among a group of vendor-plaintiffs in a related case…