From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanders v. State

Supreme Court of Mississippi
Jan 27, 1975
306 So. 2d 636 (Miss. 1975)

Opinion

No. 48206.

January 27, 1975.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Choctaw County, Marshall Perry, J..

Jack Carlisle, Ackerman, Eaves Eaves, Louisville, for appellant.

A.F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Vera Madel Speakes, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before RODGERS, SMITH and SUGG, JJ.


Sanders was indicted under Mississippi Code Annotated section 97-29-45 (1972) for using obscene language in a telephone conversation. He was convicted in the Circuit Court of Choctaw County and sentenced to two years in the penitentiary.

The indictment is, in part, as follows:

[D]id wilfully, unlawfully, and feloniously use profane, vulgar, indecent, threatening, obscene, and insulting language over the telephone, said profane, vulgar, indecent, threatening, obscene, and insulting language being "I Want You,". . . .

The defendant demurred to the indictment and assigned as grounds the following:

1. The indictment charges no crime known to the law, and is, therefore, wholly void.

2. The language in the indictment "I want you" is neither profane, vulgar, indecent, threatening, obscene or insulting when used over the telephone.

The question of whether the indictment charges a crime is a question of law for decision by the court. In Spears v. State, 253 Miss. 108, 175 So.2d 158 (1965), this Court stated:

Whether the matter set out in the indictment is obscene or not is a question of law primarily for the court to decide as a matter of law. The court under the indictment in the case at bar could not have determined from the indictment whether or not the language was obscene, vulgar, indecent or insulting because it did not have the words before it to pass upon the question. (253 Miss. at 117, 175 So.2d at 162).

The demurrer was overruled and this action by the trial court is assigned as error. We hold that the demurrer should have been sustained because the words "I want you," standing alone, are neither profane, vulgar, indecent, threatening, obscene nor insulting.

Reversed and appellant discharged.

GILLESPIE, C.J., and PATTERSON, INZER, ROBERTSON, WALKER and BROOM, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sanders v. State

Supreme Court of Mississippi
Jan 27, 1975
306 So. 2d 636 (Miss. 1975)
Case details for

Sanders v. State

Case Details

Full title:Billy SANDERS v. STATE of Mississippi

Court:Supreme Court of Mississippi

Date published: Jan 27, 1975

Citations

306 So. 2d 636 (Miss. 1975)

Citing Cases

Shackelford v. Shirley

The Mississippi courts have not interpreted the reach of § 97-29-45, except to say that the words "I want…