From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanders v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 25, 2001
787 So. 2d 264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Summary

reversing and remanding for resentencing because the circuit court imposed a life sentence without holding a sentencing hearing after the supreme court reversed a death sentence, even though "the only sentencing option available to the trial court was the imposition of a sentence for life imprisonment"

Summary of this case from Sandoval v. State

Opinion

No. 2D00-5122.

May 25, 2001.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Pasco County, Craig C. Villanti, J.


Kristopher Sanders timely appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm without discussion the trial court's denial of all grounds except for Sanders' fifth claim, that the court erred by not conducting a sentencing hearing. As to this claim, we reverse and remand for a sentencing hearing.

Sanders was indicted for, and convicted of, murder in the first degree. He was sentenced to death. The Florida Supreme Court affirmed the conviction, vacated the sentence of death, and remanded for a new penalty phase proceeding. Sanders v. State, 707 So.2d 664, 669 (Fla. 1998). On remand, the State agreed not to pursue the death penalty. Accordingly, the only sentencing option available to the trial court was the imposition of a sentence for life imprisonment, see §§ 782.04 (1)(a), 775.082 (1), Fla. Stat. (1993), which the court imposed without holding a sentencing hearing.

Sanders contends, and we agree, that the trial court erred by not holding a sentencing hearing. A criminal defendant's presence is required at every critical stage. This extends to "any stage of the criminal proceeding that is critical to its, outcome if [the defendant's] presence would contribute to the fairness of the procedure." Kentucky v. Stincer, 482 U.S. 730, 745, 107 S.Ct. 2658, 96 L.Ed.2d 631 (1987). The right to be present applies to a sentencing hearing. See Proffitt v. Wainwright, 685 F.2d 1227, 1257 (11th Cir. 1982); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.180 (a)(9) (providing for the presence of the defendant at the imposition of sentence).

Accordingly, we affirm in part reverse in part and remand for a sentencing hearing at which Sanders' presence is required.

BLUE, A.C.J., and STRINGER, J., Concur.


Summaries of

Sanders v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 25, 2001
787 So. 2d 264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

reversing and remanding for resentencing because the circuit court imposed a life sentence without holding a sentencing hearing after the supreme court reversed a death sentence, even though "the only sentencing option available to the trial court was the imposition of a sentence for life imprisonment"

Summary of this case from Sandoval v. State

describing the sentence as “predetermined” if the death penalty is not sought

Summary of this case from Blanco v. Sec'y, Fla. Dep't of Corr.

stating that a defendant is entitled to be present at every critical stage of the proceedings

Summary of this case from Garcia v. State
Case details for

Sanders v. State

Case Details

Full title:Kristopher SANDERS, Appellant v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: May 25, 2001

Citations

787 So. 2d 264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Sandoval v. State

Moreover, this is not the first time this court has reversed for resentencing when the length of the sentence…

Garcia v. State

Because a motion pursuant to rule 3.170 has been treated as a critical stage of proceedings in the trial…