From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sandberg v. Ruddmelikian, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Oct 29, 1951
192 F.2d 192 (3d Cir. 1951)

Opinion

No. 10471.

Submitted on briefs October 18, 1951.

Decided October 29, 1951.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; William H. Kirkpatrick, Judge.

James J. O'Brien and Fox, Rothschild, O'Brien Frankel, all of Philadelphia, Pa. (Fox, Rothschild, O'Brien Frankel, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

John A. Kenney, Carlile E. King and Kenney, Soens King, all of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.

Before GOODRICH, KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.


This is an appeal by the buyer of certain vending devices from the refusal of the trial court to award him the balance claimed to be due from a deposit made by him with the seller. The case was tried without a jury and the trial judge entered an opinion stating his reasons for denying the plaintiff recovery. We agree with the trial judge and the reasons assigned by him. We, therefore, affirm upon the opinion of Judge Kirkpatrick of the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

The judgment will be affirmed.


Summaries of

Sandberg v. Ruddmelikian, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Oct 29, 1951
192 F.2d 192 (3d Cir. 1951)
Case details for

Sandberg v. Ruddmelikian, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Samuel SANDBERG, Appellant, v. RUDDMELIKIAN, Inc

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Oct 29, 1951

Citations

192 F.2d 192 (3d Cir. 1951)

Citing Cases

Bristol v. Colorado Oil and Gas Corporation

See Merrill, Sec. 84. But since the "covenant is not to operate absolutely but to operate reasonably and with…