From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanchez Tapia v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nov 16, 1964
338 F.2d 416 (2d Cir. 1964)

Opinion

No. 77, Docket 28903.

Argued October 16, 1964.

Decided November 16, 1964.

Pedro E. Sanchez Tapia, pro se.

Robert E. Morgenthau, U.S. Atty., Southern Dist. of New York (Stephen Charnas, Dawnald Henderson, Asst. U.S. Attys., of counsel), for appellee.

Before WATERMAN, MOORE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.


On the ground that the conviction was procured fraudulently, appellant brought suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York to annul a judgment of conviction entered against him in 1941 in the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico. Appellant also in this suit sought to obtain damages in tort for "fraud, deceit and false representations." He named several individual defendants, but process was served only upon the United States. The government moved to dismiss the suit under Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter. The motion was granted. The court's opinion is reported at 227 F. Supp. 35. We affirm.

Appellant was convicted and sentenced in the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico. Only that court has jurisdiction to entertain appellant's action to annul his conviction, and we concur with the court below that the grant of summary judgment should be without prejudice so that, if so advised, appellant can begin a coram nobis proceeding in Puerto Rico.

As to appellant's tort claim against the government, the district court properly held that it had no jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b) et seq., for the Federal Tort Claims Act does not apply to "[a]ny claim arising out of * * * false imprisonment, false arrest, malicious prosecution, abuse of process * * misrepresentation, deceit * * *." 28 U.S.C. § 2680(h). Nor could the court have taken jurisdiction on any other basis, Dalehite v. United States, 346 U.S. 15, 30-31, 73 S.Ct. 956, 97 L.Ed. 1427 (1953).

We find it unnecessary to consider the alternative ground of dismissal, that of time bar, relied upon by the district court, 227 F. Supp. 35, 37.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Sanchez Tapia v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nov 16, 1964
338 F.2d 416 (2d Cir. 1964)
Case details for

Sanchez Tapia v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Pedro E. SANCHEZ TAPIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Nov 16, 1964

Citations

338 F.2d 416 (2d Cir. 1964)

Citing Cases

Walia v. Holder

As to the alleged making of false statements in the 2008 Performance Appraisal, “Congress has expressly…

Walia v. Holder

As to the alleged making of false statements in the 2008 Performance Appraisal, "Congress has expressly…