From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanai v. Alexander

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 24, 2008
283 F. App'x 551 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-35305.

Submitted April 22, 2008.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed June 24, 2008.

Cyrus Sanai, Beverly Hills, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Robert Dean Welden, Washington State Bar Association, Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-07-00295-MWM.

Before: GRABER, FISHER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.



ORDER

The memorandum disposition file on May 6, 2008, is withdrawn. A replacement memorandum disposition will be filed concurrently with this order.

The petition for panel rehearing is denied. We deny Appellant's request for an order directing the district court to stay the action because the request was raised for the first time in the petition for rehearing.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Fredric Sanai, an attorney, appeals from the district court's judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging civil rights violations in connection with his Washington State Bar disciplinary proceeding. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.

Younger abstention requires dismissal of this action. See Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971); see also Middlesex County Ethics Comm. v. Garden State Bar Ass'n, 457 U.S. 423, 434, 102 S.Ct. 2515, 73 L.Ed.2d 116 (1982) (setting forth Younger abstention doctrine requirements in the context of state bar disciplinary proceedings); Hirsh v. Justices of Supreme Court of Cal., 67 F.3d 708, 713 (9th Cir. 1995) (per curiam) (concluding that Younger abstention was appropriate where appellant faced ongoing state bar disciplinary proceedings when he brought suit in federal court).

Because we affirm based on the Younger abstention doctrine, we do not reach any other issues. We vacate the district court's judgment and remand with instructions to dismiss the action without prejudice.

Sanai's request for judicial notice is denied.

The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.

AFFIRMED in part; VACATED in part; and REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.


Summaries of

Sanai v. Alexander

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 24, 2008
283 F. App'x 551 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Sanai v. Alexander

Case Details

Full title:Fredric SANAI, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gerry ALEXANDER, an…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jun 24, 2008

Citations

283 F. App'x 551 (9th Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

Sanai v. Alexander

Fredric SANAI, petitioner, v. Gerry ALEXANDER, et al.Case below, 283 Fed.Appx. 551. Petition for writ of…

Hadley v. Hadley

The Court determines that dismissal without prejudice is appropriate in this case. See Sanai v. Alexander,…